Java on Google App Engine: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Java Student User Group Austria - Java + JVM in Wien Österreich / Vienna Austria
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
(QUqhNAFQuquEAgz)
(wJwvQNvbtbHRfJYLDMT)
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
−
one of the ways in which we can learn seo besides .  By ptrticipaaing in the or  we can improve our seo skills. To find more information about  please visit my pages. And to find more information about please visit my  pages. Thank you So much. |
+
I think that the number one issue with JavaFX is that you have to learn yet aenohtr language, and with little gain. There's a number of existing languages out there that can do what JavaFX does, why having to learn something else? This new language is ugly (you can get lost in the brackets a la LISP) and the metaphor is quite different from Java, which means a big learning curve for Java programmers. I wish I could be more constructive in my comments. But the more I think about it the less I see how this can be good for Sun.

Version vom 16. Dezember 2012, 08:44 Uhr

I think that the number one issue with JavaFX is that you have to learn yet aenohtr language, and with little gain. There's a number of existing languages out there that can do what JavaFX does, why having to learn something else? This new language is ugly (you can get lost in the brackets a la LISP) and the metaphor is quite different from Java, which means a big learning curve for Java programmers. I wish I could be more constructive in my comments. But the more I think about it the less I see how this can be good for Sun.

Abgerufen von „https://jsug.at/w/index.php?title=Java_on_Google_App_Engine&oldid=3336“